Rest as a Radical Act
April 12, 2024
Going off-grid has been central to Early Majority’s values since the beginning. In the most simple and literal sense, that means stepping into the outdoors and attempting to disentangle oneself, however briefly, from the web of seemingly eternal ‘e-bligations’. But we also think of ‘off-grid’ in the more figurative sense.
As we 21st-century serfs are ever more enclosed upon even bodily functions have been re-characterised as fiscally deleterious. In this moment, sleep ceases to be an autonomic and therefore peacefully accepted fact of life but is instead headlined as ‘costing the economy X billion dollars per year’.
We could do some fascinating cultural gymnastics like the Japanese, with their habit of “inemuri” (“I am present whilst sleeping”): where nodding off in meetings signals exhaustion due to dedication to one’s job. Sure, we have softly furnished corporate spaces signalling recline (coded: ‘progressive’, ‘enlightened’, ’creative’). But basically, in the broad Western context, napping is taboo. Interestingly, recent research reports Brits (25%) and Americans (33%) are, in fact, having a bit of daytime shut-eye, but not because it is socially acceptable, rather due to working from home (where, curiously, you will earn a salary on average one-third less for a job based on-site).
At the same time, a whole industry has sprung up around this inconveniently ineradicable feature of mammalian life. ‘Discover your chronotype’, ‘strap on a wearable’, ‘climb in a pod', 'make your mattress smart…' mostly conceptualising unconsciousness as a period of unbillable hours to be maximally streamlined, preferably by buying into some technological solution. If we really must sleep, we should at least consume.
Instead of lying fallow, we seek to marshal, to corral; viewed through this lens of productivity, we must always be doing something.
The Dutch might be a rare [Western] exception with their concept of Niksen: “doing nothing without a purpose”. The crucial qualification being: “without a purpose”, as if preempting the thought that any period of inactivity must be purposeful.
There’s a suspicion of napping, which needs to be allayed. And don’t get us wrong, we are pro-conscious, pro-productive! But where is sleeping life in harmony with waking life when we are told we should be ‘grinding’ hundred-hour weeks?
What we really want to express is that something is lost in instrumentalist thinking. There is such joy in leaning against a tree, lying down in the park, and pushing one’s hat over one’s eyes.
We celebrate this quiet act of rebellion.
Turn off, tune out, take rest.